| |
|
 |
|
Matches 851 to 900 of 3,417
| # |
Notes |
Linked to |
| 851 |
Burial records him as "a child" | WORGER, Daniel ^ (I10547)
|
| 852 |
Burial records Rebecca as being 55 years of age. | BROADE AKA BROADBRIDGE, Rebecca (I6781)
|
| 853 |
Burial records this child as being the "daughter of William Cleveland". | CLEVELAND, Sarah ✝ (I14654)
|
| 854 |
Burial records this individual as an "infant". | MONGER, Letitia (I10875)
|
| 855 |
Burial records this person as a "poor widow". | DALLIE, Jane (I5248)
|
| 856 |
burial states "infant son of John" | LITTLER, John (I14144)
|
| 857 |
Burial states 12 years of age residing at 6 de Crespigny Villas, Camberwell, Surrey, England
removed from St. Thomas' Hospital | GILL, Harry Norman ^ (I18676)
|
| 858 |
burial states daughter of Charles. | RUCK, Jane (I5620)
|
| 859 |
Burial states he was a "very aged man". | LACY, Thomas (I13832)
|
| 860 |
Burial states that individual was a child. | PAGE, William ^ (I14265)
|
| 861 |
Burial:
SURNAME GIVEN NAME EVT DATE YEAR PARENTS/SPOUSE PLACE SOURCE
AYLETT Emma Jane DBL 08 Aug 1859 Wallers Row, 1-3/4 Faversham BT | AYLETT, Emma Jane ^ (I19065)
|
| 862 |
Buried 21 Oct 1616 a poor old widow | Jane (I16575)
|
| 863 |
Buried 6 Dec 1607 a poor man of Vinehill
First name(s) Cicely
Last name Wyborne
Name note -
Marriage year 1589
Marriage date 09 Jun 1589
Marriage place Chartham
Spouse's first name(s) John
Spouse's last name Newnd
Residence Kent, England | WYBORN, Richard (I16574)
|
| 864 |
Buried as "an infant of Robert Atkins". | ATKINS, Infant ^ (I18998)
|
| 865 |
Buried as "Edward of Edward and Elizabeth Copping" | COPPING, Edward ^ (I16929)
|
| 866 |
Buried as "Elizabeth Coppin Widow" | KISBY, Elizabeth (I13269)
|
| 867 |
Buried as "householder".
Richard was a yeoman and intervened with his brother, Thomas, against John Bland, rector of Adisham, 1553;2 an appraiser of the inventory of John Austen of Chillenden 1567 (PRC 28/1, f.39r & v); occurs bond Jun 1568 (SAS/A613).
Bond in £66 13s 4d to perform covenants in SAS/A612
This record is held by East Sussex and Brighton and Hove Record Office (ESBHRO)
See contact details
Reference: SAS/A613
Title: Bond in £66 13s 4d to perform covenants in SAS/A612
Description:
William Kinge, clerk, with Richard Austen of Adisham, Kent, yeoman, and Gregory Bradshaw of Kingston, Kent, yeoman, to the dean and chapter
Date: 14 Jun 1568
Held by: East Sussex and Brighton and Hove Record Office (ESBHRO), not available at The National Archives
Language: English
Richard Austin was born Wickhambreaux c. 1512; m. Adisham
1536 or 1538 Agnes a’Denne (b. Barham, Kent, 1520; d. Adisham, where
buried on 28 March 1588), a lineal descendant of Robertus de Den,
‘pencerna’, or butler to Edward the Confessor, and daughter of Thomas
Denne by his second wife Margaret Naisshe (see sub Denne of Denne Hill).
Richard Austen, widower, was buried Adisham 15 Dec 1592 (will dated 1587
pr. CCC 1592, ref PRC32/37-89, leaving Communion cup to Adisham
Church)
My Facebook posts concerning this Richard and his forebears:
1. To Charo Duff: Elizabeth Austin's parents were Richard Austin and Agnes a'Denne. He was born circa 1510 at Wickhambreaux. I descend through Elizabeth's brother, Matthew Austin.. I have Richard Austin's Will, as well as those of his father and grandfather. The family was middle class with wealth expected of the middle class. There are no titles or peerages in this Austin line.
2. To Charo Duff: First, the wife of Robert Austen, of Adisham, was not buried nor died on or about 25 Oct 1538. That Elizabeth is clearly defined in the Parish Register of Adisham as being a child. The death/burial of Robert Austen's wife is unknown but can be dated at sometime between 1514, the calculated date of the birth of her last child but before 23 Nov 1544, the date of Robert Austen's Will. Also, in every reliable source Robert Austen's wife's name is unknown. So, there is even no clear evidence that her name was Elizabeth. As Richard's first daughter is named Edith and his second daughter is named Elizabeth and as Agnes a'Denne's mother's name is also unknown, Richard's wife could be either Edith or Elizabeth. Only finding her mentioned as an Austen in her own father's Will will prove what her name was.
Anyone who has connected her to a Dutch woman and then claims that woman to be a noblewoman is entirely wrong. Her father Peiter was not a nobleman, either. He was a castellan of the Loevestein castle in the what is now the Netherlands. Usually the duties of a castellan consisted of military responsibility for the castle's garrison, maintaining defences and protecting the castle's lands, combined with the legal administration of local lands and workers including the castle's domestic staff. If this was a true connection to Robert Austin KAS would have the details. A search of their website through the Google site search confirms the opposite through the absence of any such information. Additionally, the Adisham article researched and written by Edward Hasted fails to mention any of the Austen's by name even though they rented Court-Lodge on the manor. Had there been a noble connection Hasted would definitely have mentioned that connection. The article can be read on British History Online.
Now, the children of Robert Austen and his wife: there are many baptisms of Austen children between 1538 and 1580 in the Parish Register of Adisham. Many of those baptisms do not specify a parent's name - there were at least 3 other Austen brothers having children at the same time. However, the births attributable to Richard and Agnes can be reasonably calculated based on the early baptisms and the later ones that specify Richard as the father. I have attached a screen shot of my own tree that shows the children with their baptism dates - I'll have to do this in two screen shots as there are so many children. Children whose names contain a ^ symbol indicate those who died as children or without children of their own.
3. To Charo Duff: There was a Sir Robert Austen but he was from Tenterden and firmly rooted at Hall Place in Bexley. He was born circa 1595 and died in 1660.
Sir Robert Austen is mentioned in KAS article "Bexley: The Church, Hall Place and Blendon" pp 370-371, online at https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/.../Vol.018.../018-38.pdf
"On the east wall of the north chancel is the monument of the next owner of Hall Place, Sir Robert Austen, who came from Tenterden. He buried here, in July 1653, two of his children, Thomas and William. Created a baronet in July 1660, he served as sheriff of this county in 1660 and 1661. He died in 1666, aged 79. The monument mentions, but does not name, his first wife, Margaret Williamson, who only surviving child Elizabeth became Lady Dacres of Cheshunt. His second wife, Ann Muns, is named on the monument; she survived the baronet for twenty-one years..."
In a footnote
"In 1654-5, February 14, the manor of Chelsea was sold to him and two others as trustees for the daughters and coheirs of James, Duke of Hamilton, the Ladies Ann and Susan, for GB1185. In 1660 Sir Robert Austin united with others in conveying the manor of Chelsea to Charles Cheyne (Faulkner's History of Chelsea, i, 3288, 330)."
4..Response from Charo Duff: I guess everyone else's trees are rubbish on ancestry too as that's where I've got most of the information...
My response: That's right. Very few actually take the time and trouble to do their own research in primary sources. Having been a professional historical researcher and genealogist since 1990 I can tell you that people just simply copy from other trees. I have also lectured on this very subject. It was bad enough in 2012. Now, the errors are beginning to pile up exponentially. The problem is not only contained on Ancestry, but on MyHeritage, and FamilySearch, which is even one step more serious as strangers can change your own tree.
4. In response to Charo Duff and her incessant posting of Austens in Benenden: These individuals are from Benenden. I have no information on this group of Austens. They are not directly connected to the group of Austens at Adisham and Wickhambreaux., the earliest of whom that is known is Robert born circa 1430s.
All I can say is do your own research in primary sources and follow the Genealogical Standards of Proof as onerous and pedantic as they are. They can be read on the BCG Certification website.
5. To Charo Duff: The discussion above related to the incorrect assignment of a knighthood to Robert Austen of Adisham (born ca 1479-bur 26 Nov 1544) who was the grandfather of Elizabeth Austen who married William Henniker (settled in Goodnestone-next-Wingham). The discussion had nothing to do with your 5th great-grandparent.
To add to the proof of the Elizabeth Austen a) being the daughter of Richard Austen and Agnes a'Denne and b) that this Elizabeth Austen married William Henykar [sic], here is the excerpt from the Will of Richard Austen:
IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN, the 21st day of May and in the thirty year of the reign of our sovereign Lady Elizabeth, by the grace of God Queen of England, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, et cetera, I RICHARD AUSTEN, of the parish of Adisham, in the County of Kent, yeoman, do make and ordain this my last Will and Testament in manner and form following:
...
Item, I will unto ELIZABETH HENYKAR, my daughter, one cow.
...
PROBATE made at this court before Stephen Lakes, Commissary, the 13th day of February A.D. 1592 upon the oaths of WILLIAM SMYTH and VALENTINE AUSTEN, and MATHEW AUSTEN Executors.
[Source: Consistory Court of Canterbury, Will, Consistory Court of Canterbury (England, Canterbury: Canterbury Cathedral Archives), PRC32/37-89, Will dated 21 May 1592, Canterbury Cathedral Archives, Canterbury, Kent,, England.] | AUSTIN, Richard (I10323)
|
| 868 |
Buried as "infant daughter of Edward". | POPE, Mary (I5048)
|
| 869 |
Buried as "infant daughter of Edward". | POPE, Elisabeth (I5051)
|
| 870 |
Buried as "John Coppin householder"
Borden Extracts
C 25 Dec 1679 COPPING Edward John/Elizabeth
c 13 Dec 1680 Coppin Susanna John/Elizabeth, child dbl 25 Dec 1680
c 12 Mar 1682 Coppin Elizabeth John/Elizabeth
c 20 Jul 1684 Coppin Thomas John/Elizabeth
c 14 Feb 1685 Coppin Susanna John/Elizabeth
c 1 Jan 1688 Coppin Anne John/Elizabeth, child dbl 5 Oct 1690
c 26 Jan 1690 Coppin John John/Elizabeth
dbl 12 Sep 1701 Coppin Mary d/o Elizabeth Coppin, widow
Bredgar done - no Coppin entries
Patronymica Britannia a dictionary of family names by Mark Antony Lower, M.A., F.S.A. London, 1860.
Coppen. Coppin. Means "Elevated" as "Coppin in hevin," is Elevated to Heaven. Jamieson is the authority in his "Origin of the Scottish Language."
The root appears to be Anglo-Saxon. Cop means the summit. Probably from the lofty residence of the first bearer of the name. | COPPING, John (I13268)
|
| 871 |
Buried as "John Dawe Senr.”
Two DNA matches on Gedmatch to people who are researching Ambrose Dawe bc 1730 at Brenchley are as below. Both of these individuals have very full trees on Gedmatch and I have reviewed both of them. There are no other individuals in common with me other than Ambrose Dawe somewhat proving my genealogical Daies or Dawe line is correct. The relationship between Ambrose Dawe researchers and myself would be a half-cousin.
! Kit TL4458952 (*Kerry Squires Barker) [Ancestry]
Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs
2 218,580,550 220,384,126 3.2 258
8 139,765,545 141,184,000 3.8 383
15 27,425,002 29,450,276 6.6 294
16 21,185,384 23,506,940 3.1 255
17 8,084,676 9,359,342 3.7 268
20 45,261,041 46,490,407 3.2 273
Largest segment = 6.6 cM
Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 23.7cM (0.66 Pct)
6 shared segments found for this comparison.
426840 SNPs used for this comparison.
52.727 Pct SNPs are full identical
!Kit TV1660081 (*westhm) [Ancestry]
I believe this is the kit for a child of the above kit holder.
Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs
1 240,238,025 241,126,234 3.1 249
3 129,012,744 132,846,881 3.3 498
6 167,169,223 168,389,858 4 204
7 155,403,168 156,280,764 3.1 236
9 129,460,914 132,053,313 3.8 304
12 89,642,084 94,091,999 4.4 626
15 27,687,150 29,500,246 5.7 242
15 92,650,263 93,634,724 3.8 299
Largest segment = 5.7 cM
Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 31.1cM (0.866 Pct)
8 shared segments found for this comparison.
427028 SNPs used for this comparison.
52.963 Pct SNPs are full identical | DAIES OR DAWE, John (I15828)
|
| 872 |
Buried as "wife of John". | CHEESMAN, Margaret (I15827)
|
| 873 |
Buried as "wife of Richard|". | Elizabeth (I19170)
|
| 874 |
Buried as "wife of Robert". | VIDEAN, Bennett (I19167)
|
| 875 |
Buried as "wife of Thomas of Mornicke". | Margaret (I16488)
|
| 876 |
Buried as a "child and daughter of Edward Pope". | POPE, Elisabeth (I5047)
|
| 877 |
Buried as a "child of Richard" but no christening was located. | HARRIS, Richard ✝ (I17123)
|
| 878 |
Buried as a "widow". | RUCK, Elizabeth (I3417)
|
| 879 |
Buried as a child of Mr. William and Anne | SAWKINS, Ellen (I14312)
|
| 880 |
Buried as a child of William and Anne. | SAWKINS, Anne (I14313)
|
| 881 |
Buried as a child. | PRESTON, Katharine ^ (I17452)
|
| 882 |
Buried as a householder.
SURNAME GIVEN NAME EVT DATE YEAR PARENTS/SPOUSE PLACE SOURCE
LAURENCE Richard DBL 27 Mar 1627 Faversham AD, BT
Will Lawrence Richard Faversham 1570 1573 PRC/17/41/313b PRC/16/62 L/3 1573
Inv Lawrence Richard Faversham 1573 PRC/10/7/25 Will 1573
Inv Lawrence Richard Faversham 1626 PRC/10/61/139 1626 | LAWRENCE, Richard (I17459)
|
| 883 |
Buried as a householder.
SURNAME GIVEN NAME RESIDENCE YEAR WILL TYPE VOLUME FOLIO FHL FILM #
PRESTON Thomas Faversham 1679-1683 AD 17 RW 75 408 188976 | PRESTON, Thomas (I17422)
|
| 884 |
Buried as a widow. | HODGES, Elizabeth (I19588)
|
| 885 |
Buried as a youth. | PRESTON, Thomas ^ (I17447)
|
| 886 |
Buried as an "infant". | POPE, Elisabeth (I5046)
|
| 887 |
Buried as an infant | LACY, William (I13840)
|
| 888 |
Buried as an infant. | WORGER, Judith ^ (I10901)
|
| 889 |
Buried as an infant. | PARRAM, Mary ^ (I18392)
|
| 890 |
Buried as an infant. | WALMSLEY OR WAMBSLEY, William ^ (I19091)
|
| 891 |
Buried as an infant. | COPPEN, Joseph ^ (I4596)
|
| 892 |
Buried as an infant. | CHAPMAN, Chatherine (I5589)
|
| 893 |
Buried as an infant. | CHAPMAN, William Cobb (I5593)
|
| 894 |
Buried as an infant. | RUCK, John ^ (I6626)
|
| 895 |
Buried as being of Busted [sic], widow.
Denne David c 21 Jan 1609/10 s/o William the elder Bishopsbourne PR
Denne William c 16 Aug 1612 s/o William the elder
Denne William c 25 Sep 1642 s/o Peter/Anne
Denne David c 16 Dec 1642 s/o Peter/Anne
Den Anne c 3 Aug 1645 d/o Peter/Anne
Denne John c 20 Dec 1646 s/o Peter/Anne
Denne Peter c 2 Apr 1648 s/o Peter/Anne
Denne Jane c 6 Nov 1649 d/o Peter/nwn
Den Margaret c 20 Mar 1650/1 d/o Peter/nwn
Denne Susan c 15 May 1653 d/o Peter/nwn
Denne William c 5 Nov 1655 s/o Peter/nwn
Denne Katharine c 5 Nov 1657 d/o Peter/nwn
restart
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/record/browse?id=gbprs%2fcant%2f005264836%2f00429 p31 | FRANCKLIN, Mary (I19261)
|
| 896 |
Buried as daughter of Anthony. | BACK, Judith ^ (I17520)
|
| 897 |
buried as daughter of Dorothy Hawking, widow | HAWKING, Honour (I16526)
|
| 898 |
Buried as daughter of Hammon. | GOTELY, Ann ^ (I19206)
|
| 899 |
Buried as daughter of John Fox of Ashford. | FOX, Jane ^ (I5831)
|
| 900 |
Buried as daughter of Robert. Also note mother Martha was buried the month before at Graveney. | PRESTON, Sarah ^ (I17440)
|
|
|
|
